Improving urgent grants: Insights from Australian emergencies
Posted on 20 Nov 2024
A leading thinker in digitally-led government and business transformation, Sanja Galic, believes…
Posted on 20 Nov 2024
By Sanja Galic, senior client partner at Publicis Sapient
A leading thinker in digitally-led government and business transformation, Sanja Galic, believes advanced data and technology could dramatically improve disaster grantmaking.
In an emergency situation, such as floods, bushfires or other natural disasters, people need help urgently. As well as meeting survival needs such as food, shelter and medical care, swift assistance also helps stabilise affected communities, prevent economic collapse and enable people to rebuild their lives faster. I previously led the Emergency Services Portfolio at Service NSW that was responsible for standing up and distributing over $1 billion of emergency and recovery grant payments in NSW and have seen how critical this is for citizens.
Despite the need for speed, government recovery and emergency grant programs are often slow. They take weeks to set up and distribute and are extremely admin-intensive. There are multiple layers of approval, documentation and verification processes - all of which can delay disbursement. Eligibility criteria may be complex, there are coordination challenges between different agencies and limited manpower to process claims can lead to backlogs.
For citizens, this only adds to the ordeal of an already stressful time. Struggling with basic daily existence, possibly without power or internet, they need to fill in forms, find documentation (which may have been lost) and then wait for manual assessment. Many might not even apply for funds because they’re too busy trying to navigate the disaster.
A faster, more proactive approach helps everyone. If governments have got the right data on who needs help, they can reach out in days or even hours. Governments hold a vast amount of data on citizens and residents. Collectively, governments should know where someone resides or runs their business, if their location was impacted and the level of impact, what payroll tax threshold their business is on and what income they earn.
"Having the right data and using it effectively can make a huge difference in a natural disaster."
In an emergency, governments should be able to immediately identify people in a disaster zone and get funds to them urgently in their hour of need. Unfortunately, this rarely happens.
The problem governments face is that their data tends to be extremely fragmented and siloed. Federal agencies, State departments and local councils all hold different kinds of information on citizens and residents. Their systems may not be connected, there may be duplication and outdated information. A person may have changed address but not updated their driving licence or Medicare records. It’s difficult to ascertain if multiple records are the same person, and whether that person is still in the afflicted area.
What’s needed is a more unified approach, where different levels of government and agencies start matching data and getting a "single view of the citizen". Using data lakes and data management solutions, information from different government databases could be better aligned. Artificial Intelligence (AI) and machine learning also have an important role to play in automating the data- matching process, since governments may not have the people or the budgets to manually collate and sync all of the data into a cohesive view.
One important aspect is that citizens need to give explicit consent for their data to be shared. Our recent Digital Citizen Report 2024 indicates that people are willing to share data when they need support. They are also broadly in favour of government AI usage if it makes communications and outcomes quicker and more positive and efficient for the user. The key is transparency and clearly communicating the benefits, including what data will be collected and how it will be shared and used.
When a declaration of an emergency and disaster is in force, Part VIA of the Privacy Act enhances and enables the collection, use and disclosure of personal information between Australian Government agencies and State and Territory authorities, private sector organisations, non-government organisations and others. Governments should leverage this to provide proactive assistance to people and communities and improve the experience, cutting weeks of waiting to just days or hours.
Having the right data and using it effectively can make a huge difference in a natural disaster. In a recent bushfire emergency, the NSW Office of Local Government wanted to pay council rates for those affected. Usually this would involve setting up an online form, asking applicants for evidence - such as the previous year’s rates notices - and then going through an assessment process.
Instead, Service NSW teams were able to take council rate data and match it with impact data. Each of the relevant councils were paid their council rates, and citizens were sent notices that their rates were already paid. The councils had their money and the citizens were relieved of payment that year, without having to apply or do anything. This was an important way to show understanding that they had been through a very difficult time and had one less thing to worry about.
Advanced data strategies and technology are key to achieving this single view of the citizen, which would allow for a more targeted and efficient distribution of grants when they are most needed. All of this creates a better citizen experience, further enhancing trust and confidence in government.
Sanja Galic has worked in digital business transformation and technology-enhanced performance improvement for 25 years and was a director at Service NSW between 2018 and 2020, where she held project management, program management and enterprise change roles.
Posted on 20 Nov 2024
A leading thinker in digitally-led government and business transformation, Sanja Galic, believes…
Posted on 20 Nov 2024
A leading UK charity think tank and consultancy says charities must better measure and use data if…
Posted on 24 Sep 2024
Former professional grantwriter Kylie Cirak believes that grantmakers should look more favourably…
Posted on 24 Jul 2024
A “definitive” publication about grant funding in the United Kingdom has collated data and insights…
Posted on 19 Jul 2024
A British small grants scheme is among a handful of grantmakers globally experimenting with…
Posted on 06 Mar 2024
Philanthropic funding for environmental and climate change causes is increasingly rapidly, but not…
Posted on 05 Dec 2023
A young, fast-growing consultancy has won Australia’s most prestigious award for social impact…
Posted on 10 Nov 2023
SmartyGrants has urged the federal government to make a major “technological and cultural shift” in…
Posted on 31 Oct 2023
On the North Island of New Zealand, Palmerston North City Council (PNCC) governs a university city…
Posted on 31 Oct 2023
At a recent Grantmaking Muster in Melbourne, I gave a presentation on the challenges of measurement.
Posted on 19 Sep 2023
The Albanese government has acted on its election promise to create a “stronger more diverse and…
Posted on 08 Aug 2023
SmartyGrants is going backstage to boost artists’ careers in Australia and the United Kingdom.